Who Mostly To Blame for the Death of Eva Smith Essay Example

Who Mostly To Blame for the Death of Eva Smith? Essay Mr Arthur Birling, a selfish and opinionated man, who is concerned to a great extent for his stature, and well being. Plays a big part in the death of Eva Smith. As he is the one who begins the tragic downfall of the young girl. Mr Birlings decision to discharge Eva from his industry, only leads to a chain of events. I think that if Mr Birling had never of sacked Eva Smith then, all of the other incidents which followed, would never of happened. The reason for the sacking of Eva Smith is because she asked for slightly higher wages. Mr Birling, being a selfish man, decided that this was insulting, and so discharged her. Leaving Eva Smith wandering the streets, and looking for a new job. All this information is cleverly discovered with the help of INSPECTOR GOOLE. He uses a photograph, which is only shown to Mr Birling, to remind him of the girl whom he had sacked. This left no choice for Mr Birling, but to issue the story, as the straightforward questioning of the Inspector was to provoking. After hearing this Sheila Birling (daughter of Arthur Birling), felt very sorry for Eva Smith, and started to have a go at her father. We will write a custom essay sample on Who Mostly To Blame for the Death of Eva Smith? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Who Mostly To Blame for the Death of Eva Smith? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Who Mostly To Blame for the Death of Eva Smith? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Inspector Goole then cuts in and quickly tells the family, what then happened to Eva, after she was discharged from Mr Birlings company. Sheilas part to blame in the downfall of Eva Smith, is also due to selfishness. Eva Smith had just found a new job at a department store, in which Sheila regularly visits. Sheila blackmails the store manager into sacking Eva from her job (again). The reason for Sheila to do this is because Eva Smith looked better in a hat. As Sheila was trying the hat on, she caught a glimpse of Eva smirking. This lead to Sheila complaining, and threatening the manager, that she was not going to shop at the store again. Which left the store manager no choice, but to sack young Eva. This unhappy outcome for Eva Smith is down to pure jealousy. I do not think that Sheilas part to play was as bad as her fathers, I will explain why in my conclusion. Take note that the inspector did not show Sheila a photograph of any sort, he used clever quotes to provoke her into confessing. The inspector then tells us that Eva Smith after leaving Milwards changed her name to Daisy Renton. Immediately Gerald showed a change in presence when that name was mentioned. The inspector pressurises Gerald by immediately asking him,When did you first get to know her? Gerald then tries to act innocent but knows that it wont work, so he then tells us his encounter with the new Daisy Renton. Gerald was incredibly nice and charming to Daisy, but after a short period of time he breaks her heart by leaving her. This incident is partly to blame because he leaves Daisy miserable and alone again. Which makes her begin to wonder if her life is worth living. The inspector then continues his investigating, bringing in Mrs Birling, who works for a committee, where they help people with problems. Eva Smith (Daisy Renton) asked for help, but her problem was turned down, by Mrs Birling, due to Eva changing her name to Mrs Birling. The story behind the changing of Evas name was completely due to Erics involvement. Eric (Mr Birlings son), was to blame for Eva Smiths death in a big way. He accidentally impregnated her, which was to effect her drastically, because Eric just like Gerald cowards off, leaving her money, stolen from Mr Birlings company. Erics involvement was before Eva asked Mrs Birling and her organisation for help. But the turning down was the final straw for Eva Smith, Daisy Renton and the newly named Mrs Birling. So she killed herself, which was obviously due to the Birling familys involvement. Conclusion: Whos mostly to blame? is the question I have investigated on. And my final decision is that Mr Birling, Mrs Birling, Sheila, Gerald and Eric, were all to blame for the tragic death of Eva Smith. But if it wasnt for Mr birling discharging Eva from his company, then none of the other incidents would have followed. So I feel that Mr Birling was just slightly more to blame than any of the others, but that does not mean that the other culprits should get off lighter.

Should Performance-Enhancing Drugs Be Banned In Sport Health Research Paper

Should Performance-Enhancing Drugs Be Banned In Sport Health Research Paper Free Online Research Papers Should Performance-Enhancing Drugs Be Banned In Sport Health Research Paper For an elite athlete winning is the drug of choice. Being the best however is addictive and can lead some to take performance-enhancing drugs. Sport being the business of athletes is defined as ‘conforming to set of rules for the activity while aiming to achieve excellence,’ with one of the universal ‘rules’ being the prohibition of performance-enhancing drugs, and with good reason. Doping, the colloquial term for athletes taking such drugs, is banned as it creates an uneven playing field. Doping is also quite dangerous to an athlete’s long-term health. Performance-enhancing drugs need to therefore remain banned in sport to keep the playing field level and also for the future health of athletes. Different performance-enhancing drugs cater for different purposes, as do drugs used medicinally. There are a whole range of different drugs existing for those wanting to improve their performance by increasing muscle mass and strength, increasing delivery of oxygen to tissues, masking pain, stimulating the body, relaxing, reducing weight or even masking the usage of other drugs. Despite some drugs providing the possibility of a higher level of competition, most drugs are banned outright at elite levels unless a legitimate clinical reason exists. On the surface performance-enhancing drugs simply assist and benefit the physical performance of athletes. By looking deeper it is clear that every drug has its downfall. Amphetamines for example act as a stimulant enabling athletes to stay alert longer, minimise fatigue and maintain aggressiveness. They work by making the heartbeat faster, the lungs breathe faster and the brain think faster. The negative side of this is that while the body is working at a faster rate, it is under a much higher level of stress. As a result, athletes may suffer nervousness, high blood pressure or convulsions. In extreme cases sudden death is also a possibility. Amphetamines overload the body, making it work unnaturally fast, and in some cases it is found the body is simply unable to cope. Similar dangers exist with athletes taking drugs to increase oxygen flow to tissues. Erythropoietin (EPO) is a popular drug exemplifying this. A naturally occurring protein hormone, EPO is made by the kidneys in low oxygen conditions. It acts by stimulating bone marrow cells to make more red blood cells, effectively increasing the delivery of oxygen to the kidneys. Theoretically EPO sounds beneficial to athletes, particularly endurance athletes, but once again places extra strain on the body. By increasing the production of red-blood cells EPO thickens the blood, forcing the heart to work harder. Use of EPO as a performance-enhancing drug can be linked to an increased likelihood of heart attack or stroke. Amphetamines and EPO are both a real threat to the legitimacy of athletic competition and the long-term health of the athletes themselves. They are not however very publicly well known. Androgen-anabolic steroids or AAS are by far the most infamous performance-enhancing drug. Derived from testosterone, steroids are notorious for their muscle building capabilities. They work by enhancing the transcription of specific genes. They act by binding with the androgen receptor within a cell. The complex is then translocated into the nucleus before binding with the DNA. The mRNA is then processed with an increased protein synthesis. The major anabolic affect of steroids, attractive to strength or power athletes, is an increased muscle fibre area. To achieve such effect however athletes must combine steroid use with strength training. Contrary to popular belief, steroid use on its own has a limited impact. Androgenic or negative effects of steroids are many. In both sexes jaundice and liver damage is common due to an increased metabolic load. Other side affects include fluid retention and high blood pressure. In males, increased levels of testosterone can act as negative feedback to the pituitary gland, decreasing spermatogenesis, natural testosterone and the luteinizing hormone. Males also experience baldness, gynecomastia and infertility. In females, steroid use can cause growth of facial hair, changes in or cessation of the menstrual cycle, breast atrophy and a thickening of the vocal chords (deepening the voice). Steroids also negatively affect the mental state of both genders and can lead to increased aggression, psychosis or depression. Comparing the anabolic to androgenic effects of steroids, it is surprising that athletes are still prepared to risk their health by taking steroids. The ends justifying the means, is a possible reason for athletes to take drugs, despite all the ready information on the dangers of drugs. An elite athlete is driven to win by a number of driving forces. A passion for their sport and a competitive spirit may be the initial motivating reason behind competing. Further down the track, the lure of prize money and lucrative sponsorship deals generally play a part. In some cases, the lure of fame and fortune become to strong, or too addictive, and athletes find themselves turning to illegal substances to get over the line. By investigating just three specific performance-enhancing drugs; amphetamines, EPO and steroids, it is clear that in general they impose dangerous long-term health risks. Drugs in sport however are not simply a biological dilemma. Ethics come into play where some believe that it is an athlete’s prerogative to choose whether or not they take drugs. But is it? As soon as one drug cheat enters the sporting arena all ‘clean’ athletes are immediately disadvantaged. Clean athletes are thus left in the position that they too must take drugs to remain competitive. To keep competition legitimate athletes must therefore take an ‘all for one and one for all’ stance on maintaining anti-doping laws. If the long-term health dangers are not succinct enough to prevent them from taking drugs, the impact it can have on their credibility should be. Professional sport needs to uphold its anti-doping laws or risk becoming a sad spectacle of simply who can pop the most pills. There are many substitutes to drug taking that athletes can employ to increase their performance. Diet, medicine, technology and coaching, already provide athletes with advantages, without endangering their long-term health. If nations or institutions wish to invest in sports sciences it should be to help athletes reach their individual peak physical condition, rather than push them beyond their natural limitations. Performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous to sport in reference to both health and reputation and therefore must remain banned. Bibliography http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Sports debatabase.org/details_print.asp?topicID=28 www.ausport.gov.au/asda http://espn.go.com/special/s/drugsandsports/steroids.html www.musclebuilder.com/ drugabuse.gov/about/welcome/messagesteroids305.html http://muscle.ucsd.edu/musintro/steroids.shtml http://muscle.ucsd.edu/musintro/stereff.shtml#anabolic http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/athletic-drug-test1.htm http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/athletic-drug-test3.htm http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/athletic-drug-test6.htm http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/athletic-drug-test7.htm Research Papers on Should Performance-Enhancing Drugs Be Banned In Sport Health Research PaperThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationMoral and Ethical Issues in Hiring New EmployeesThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseGenetic EngineeringTrailblazing by Eric AndersonBionic Assembly System: A New Concept of SelfOpen Architechture a white paperInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesAnalysis Of A Cosmetics AdvertisementThe Hockey Game